diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/bounces/dsn_04.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/bounces/dsn_04.txt | 124 |
1 files changed, 35 insertions, 89 deletions
diff --git a/tests/bounces/dsn_04.txt b/tests/bounces/dsn_04.txt index 9bea9758..76f7d4e5 100644 --- a/tests/bounces/dsn_04.txt +++ b/tests/bounces/dsn_04.txt @@ -1,35 +1,35 @@ From VM Sat Jun 30 11:29:01 2001 X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] - [nil "Saturday" "30" "June" "2001" "00:21:42" "+0200" "PMDF e-Mail Interconnect" "postmaster@yogi.urz.unibas.ch" nil "147" "Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed" "^From:" nil nil "6" nil nil nil nil nil] + [nil "Saturday" "30" "June" "2001" "00:21:42" "+0200" "PMDF e-Mail Interconnect" "postmaster@yogi.urz.example.ch" nil "147" "Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed" "^From:" nil nil "6" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Return-Path: <python-list-admin@python.org> -Delivered-To: barry@wooz.org -Received: from digicool.com (unknown [63.100.190.15]) - by mail.wooz.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2852FD36EC - for <barry@wooz.org>; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 18:21:58 -0400 (EDT) +Delivered-To: usery@example.org +Received: from example.com (unknown [63.100.190.15]) + by mail.example.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2852FD36EC + for <usery@example.org>; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 18:21:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from <python-list-admin@python.org> - by digicool.com (CommuniGate Pro RULES 3.4) + by example.com (CommuniGate Pro RULES 3.4) with RULES id 2122693; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 18:23:52 -0400 -Received: from ns2.digicool.com ([63.100.190.2] verified) - by digicool.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4) - with ESMTP id 2122692 for barry@mail.digicool.com; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 18:23:52 -0400 +Received: from ns2.example.com ([63.100.190.2] verified) + by example.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4) + with ESMTP id 2122692 for usery@mail.example.com; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 18:23:52 -0400 Received: from mail.python.org (mail.python.org [63.102.49.29]) - by ns2.digicool.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA15102 - for <barry@digicool.com>; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 18:22:00 -0400 + by ns2.example.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA15102 + for <usery@example.com>; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 18:22:00 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=mail.python.org) by mail.python.org with esmtp (Exim 3.21 #1) id 15G6eH-0006NJ-00 - for barry@digicool.com; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 18:22:01 -0400 -Received: from [131.152.1.4] (helo=yogi.urz.unibas.ch) + for usery@example.com; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 18:22:01 -0400 +Received: from [131.152.1.4] (helo=yogi.urz.example.ch) by mail.python.org with esmtp (Exim 3.21 #1) id 15G6d4-0006Lg-00 for python-list-admin@python.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 18:20:46 -0400 -Received: from PROCESS-DAEMON by yogi.urz.unibas.ch (PMDF V5.2-29 #33343) - id <01K5CWRKUM2O8X1X1D@yogi.urz.unibas.ch> for python-list-admin@python.org; +Received: from PROCESS-DAEMON by yogi.urz.example.ch (PMDF V5.2-29 #33343) + id <01K5CWRKUM2O8X1X1D@yogi.urz.example.ch> for python-list-admin@python.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:21:44 +0200 -Received: from yogi.urz.unibas.ch (PMDF V5.2-29 #33343) - id <01K5CWRINUF48X46F4@yogi.urz.unibas.ch>; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:21:42 +0200 -Message-id: <01K5CWRJIDYU8X46F4@yogi.urz.unibas.ch> +Received: from yogi.urz.example.ch (PMDF V5.2-29 #33343) + id <01K5CWRINUF48X46F4@yogi.urz.example.ch>; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:21:42 +0200 +Message-id: <01K5CWRJIDYU8X46F4@yogi.urz.example.ch> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: MULTIPART/REPORT; BOUNDARY="Boundary_(ID_MUSA353qRe9PeqtdeP14tg)"; REPORT-TYPE=DELIVERY-STATUS @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-lis List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> -From: PMDF e-Mail Interconnect <postmaster@yogi.urz.unibas.ch> +From: PMDF e-Mail Interconnect <postmaster@yogi.urz.example.ch> Sender: python-list-owner@python.org To: python-list-admin@python.org Subject: Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed @@ -61,14 +61,14 @@ This report relates to a message you sent with the following header fields: Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0106300001530.2750-100000@athlon.de> Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:18:49 +0200 (CEST) - From: Carsten Geckeler <uioziaremwpl@spammotel.com> + From: Carsten Geckeler <userz@example.com> To: Python <python-list@python.org> Subject: Re: Augmented Assignement (was: Re: PEP scepticism) Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients: - Recipient address: HAASM@yogi.urz.unibas.ch - Original address: max.haas@unibas.ch + Recipient address: HAASM@yogi.urz.example.ch + Original address: userx@example.ch %MAIL-E-OPENOUT, error opening !AS as output -RMS-E-CRE, ACP file create failed -SYSTEM-F-EXDISKQUOTA, disk quota exceeded @@ -78,33 +78,33 @@ Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients: Content-type: message/DELIVERY-STATUS Original-envelope-id: 0GFP00202Q2DR3@mailhub.unibas.ch -Reporting-MTA: dns;yogi.urz.unibas.ch +Reporting-MTA: dns;yogi.urz.example.ch Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 -Original-recipient: rfc822;max.haas@unibas.ch -Final-recipient: rfc822;HAASM@yogi.urz.unibas.ch +Original-recipient: rfc822;userx@example.ch +Final-recipient: rfc822;HAASM@yogi.urz.example.ch --Boundary_(ID_MUSA353qRe9PeqtdeP14tg) Content-type: MESSAGE/RFC822 Return-path: python-list-admin@python.org -Received: from yogi.urz.unibas.ch by yogi.urz.unibas.ch (PMDF V5.2-29 #33343) - id <01K5CWRINUF48X46F4@yogi.urz.unibas.ch> +Received: from yogi.urz.example.ch by yogi.urz.unibas.ch (PMDF V5.2-29 #33343) + id <01K5CWRINUF48X46F4@yogi.urz.example.ch> (original mail from python-list-admin@python.org); Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:21:42 +0200 -Received: from maser.urz.unibas.ch ([131.152.1.5]) - by yogi.urz.unibas.ch (PMDF V5.2-29 #33343) - with ESMTP id <01K5CWRGK0V68X4CRC@yogi.urz.unibas.ch> for - HAASM@yogi.urz.unibas.ch (ORCPT rfc822;max.haas@unibas.ch); Sat, +Received: from maser.urz.example.ch ([131.152.1.5]) + by yogi.urz.example.ch (PMDF V5.2-29 #33343) + with ESMTP id <01K5CWRGK0V68X4CRC@yogi.urz.example.ch> for + HAASM@yogi.urz.example.ch (ORCPT rfc822;userx@example.ch); Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:21:38 +0200 Received: from DIRECTORY-DAEMON.mailhub.unibas.ch by mailhub.unibas.ch (PMDF V6.0-24 #41480) id <0GFP00201Q2DR3@mailhub.unibas.ch> for - HAASM@yogi.urz.unibas.ch (ORCPT max.haas@unibas.ch); Sat, + HAASM@yogi.urz.example.ch (ORCPT userx@example.ch); Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:20:37 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail.python.org (mail.python.org [63.102.49.29]) by mailhub.unibas.ch (PMDF V6.0-24 #41480) - with ESMTP id <0GFP00BEAQ2C5Y@mailhub.unibas.ch> for max.haas@unibas.ch; Sat, + with ESMTP id <0GFP00BEAQ2C5Y@mailhub.unibas.ch> for userx@example.ch; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:20:37 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=mail.python.org) by mail.python.org with esmtp (Exim 3.21 #1) id 15G6bK-0006HW-00; Fri, @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ Received: from s-gec3 by justitia.jura.uni-tuebingen.de with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 15G6Zo-0002Zx-00 for <python-list@python.org>; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:17:24 +0200 Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:18:49 +0200 (CEST) -From: Carsten Geckeler <uioziaremwpl@spammotel.com> +From: Carsten Geckeler <userz@example.com> Subject: Re: Augmented Assignement (was: Re: PEP scepticism) In-reply-to: <ubsn7hte7.fsf@ctwd0143.fitlinxx.com> Sender: python-list-admin@python.org @@ -143,60 +143,6 @@ List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language On 29 Jun 2001, David Bolen wrote: -> Carsten Geckeler <uioziaremwpl@spammotel.com> writes: -> -> > The problem which some people have with augmented assignment is not that -> > they exist, but that they do not work as they expect (at least from the -> > POV of some readers). I expect that -> > ident op= expr -> > works like -> > ident = ident op expr -> > -> > At least that's what I'd have expectd comming from other programming -> > languages. -> -> Of course, one interesting point is that while you may think the above -> if coming from, say, C, what "ident = ident op expr" means in C is not -> what "ident = ident op expr" means in Python. - -Yes, that's completely true. I can accept, that Python work differently -in many cases. Actually I love Python's object stuff. That's something -more natural that in many other languages. And I can accept, that objects -(which are bound to different variable names) can be changed (like with -l.extend). - -The point is not that Python differs from C (or other languages), but that -the two statements above work differently. I can accept that, of course -(well I have to, I thing ;) ). But, when I write the following three -statements, - l = l + [3, 4] - l += [3, 4] - l.extend([3,4]) -it seems more logical to me, that the first two do the same than the last -two. I know, of course, that the last two do the same. But anyway, the -first two just _look_ more the same. - -> In C it has the result of changing data (in either case) that is -> stored in a named location ident, in Python the long form just rebinds -> the reference ident to a new object and doesn't touch the original -> object. The short form can actually get closer to the C idiom if the -> object is mutable. -> -> So I wonder if some of the confusion is people familiar with other -> language's augmented assignment trying to extrapolate that into Python -> and then running into the pre-existing differences in assignment -> versus binding? - -No, that's at least no problem for me (see above). - -Cheers, Carsten --- -Carsten Geckeler - - --- -http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list +> Carsten Geckeler <userz@example.com> writes: --Boundary_(ID_MUSA353qRe9PeqtdeP14tg)-- - - |