diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/bounces/dsn_04.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/bounces/dsn_04.txt | 202 |
1 files changed, 202 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tests/bounces/dsn_04.txt b/tests/bounces/dsn_04.txt new file mode 100644 index 00000000..9bea9758 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/bounces/dsn_04.txt @@ -0,0 +1,202 @@ +From VM Sat Jun 30 11:29:01 2001 +X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] + [nil "Saturday" "30" "June" "2001" "00:21:42" "+0200" "PMDF e-Mail Interconnect" "postmaster@yogi.urz.unibas.ch" nil "147" "Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed" "^From:" nil nil "6" nil nil nil nil nil] + nil) +Return-Path: <python-list-admin@python.org> +Delivered-To: barry@wooz.org +Received: from digicool.com (unknown [63.100.190.15]) + by mail.wooz.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2852FD36EC + for <barry@wooz.org>; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 18:21:58 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from <python-list-admin@python.org> + by digicool.com (CommuniGate Pro RULES 3.4) + with RULES id 2122693; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 18:23:52 -0400 +Received: from ns2.digicool.com ([63.100.190.2] verified) + by digicool.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4) + with ESMTP id 2122692 for barry@mail.digicool.com; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 18:23:52 -0400 +Received: from mail.python.org (mail.python.org [63.102.49.29]) + by ns2.digicool.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA15102 + for <barry@digicool.com>; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 18:22:00 -0400 +Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=mail.python.org) + by mail.python.org with esmtp (Exim 3.21 #1) + id 15G6eH-0006NJ-00 + for barry@digicool.com; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 18:22:01 -0400 +Received: from [131.152.1.4] (helo=yogi.urz.unibas.ch) + by mail.python.org with esmtp (Exim 3.21 #1) + id 15G6d4-0006Lg-00 + for python-list-admin@python.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 18:20:46 -0400 +Received: from PROCESS-DAEMON by yogi.urz.unibas.ch (PMDF V5.2-29 #33343) + id <01K5CWRKUM2O8X1X1D@yogi.urz.unibas.ch> for python-list-admin@python.org; + Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:21:44 +0200 +Received: from yogi.urz.unibas.ch (PMDF V5.2-29 #33343) + id <01K5CWRINUF48X46F4@yogi.urz.unibas.ch>; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:21:42 +0200 +Message-id: <01K5CWRJIDYU8X46F4@yogi.urz.unibas.ch> +MIME-version: 1.0 +Content-type: MULTIPART/REPORT; + BOUNDARY="Boundary_(ID_MUSA353qRe9PeqtdeP14tg)"; REPORT-TYPE=DELIVERY-STATUS +Precedence: bulk +List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> +List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org> +List-Subscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, + <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> +List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, + <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> +From: PMDF e-Mail Interconnect <postmaster@yogi.urz.unibas.ch> +Sender: python-list-owner@python.org +To: python-list-admin@python.org +Subject: Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed +Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:21:42 +0200 +X-Autogenerated: Mirror +X-Mirrored-by: <python-list-admin@python.org> +X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 (101270) + + +--Boundary_(ID_MUSA353qRe9PeqtdeP14tg) +Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +Content-language: EN-US + +This report relates to a message you sent with the following header fields: + + Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0106300001530.2750-100000@athlon.de> + Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:18:49 +0200 (CEST) + From: Carsten Geckeler <uioziaremwpl@spammotel.com> + To: Python <python-list@python.org> + Subject: Re: Augmented Assignement (was: Re: PEP scepticism) + +Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients: + + Recipient address: HAASM@yogi.urz.unibas.ch + Original address: max.haas@unibas.ch +%MAIL-E-OPENOUT, error opening !AS as output +-RMS-E-CRE, ACP file create failed +-SYSTEM-F-EXDISKQUOTA, disk quota exceeded + + +--Boundary_(ID_MUSA353qRe9PeqtdeP14tg) +Content-type: message/DELIVERY-STATUS + +Original-envelope-id: 0GFP00202Q2DR3@mailhub.unibas.ch +Reporting-MTA: dns;yogi.urz.unibas.ch + +Action: failed +Status: 5.0.0 +Original-recipient: rfc822;max.haas@unibas.ch +Final-recipient: rfc822;HAASM@yogi.urz.unibas.ch + +--Boundary_(ID_MUSA353qRe9PeqtdeP14tg) +Content-type: MESSAGE/RFC822 + +Return-path: python-list-admin@python.org +Received: from yogi.urz.unibas.ch by yogi.urz.unibas.ch (PMDF V5.2-29 #33343) + id <01K5CWRINUF48X46F4@yogi.urz.unibas.ch> + (original mail from python-list-admin@python.org); Sat, + 30 Jun 2001 00:21:42 +0200 +Received: from maser.urz.unibas.ch ([131.152.1.5]) + by yogi.urz.unibas.ch (PMDF V5.2-29 #33343) + with ESMTP id <01K5CWRGK0V68X4CRC@yogi.urz.unibas.ch> for + HAASM@yogi.urz.unibas.ch (ORCPT rfc822;max.haas@unibas.ch); Sat, + 30 Jun 2001 00:21:38 +0200 +Received: from DIRECTORY-DAEMON.mailhub.unibas.ch by mailhub.unibas.ch + (PMDF V6.0-24 #41480) id <0GFP00201Q2DR3@mailhub.unibas.ch> for + HAASM@yogi.urz.unibas.ch (ORCPT max.haas@unibas.ch); Sat, + 30 Jun 2001 00:20:37 +0200 (MET DST) +Received: from mail.python.org (mail.python.org [63.102.49.29]) + by mailhub.unibas.ch (PMDF V6.0-24 #41480) + with ESMTP id <0GFP00BEAQ2C5Y@mailhub.unibas.ch> for max.haas@unibas.ch; Sat, + 30 Jun 2001 00:20:37 +0200 (MET DST) +Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=mail.python.org) + by mail.python.org with esmtp (Exim 3.21 #1) id 15G6bK-0006HW-00; Fri, + 29 Jun 2001 18:18:58 -0400 +Received: from [134.2.34.92] (helo=nemesis.jura.uni-tuebingen.de ident=qmailr) + by mail.python.org with smtp (Exim 3.21 #1) + id 15G6Zp-0006Ee-00 for python-list@python.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 18:17:25 -0400 +Received: (qmail 31643 invoked from network); Fri, 29 Jun 2001 22:17:24 +0000 +Received: from justitia.jura.uni-tuebingen.de (mail@134.2.34.12) + by nemesis.jura.uni-tuebingen.de with SMTP; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 22:17:24 +0000 +Received: from s-gec3 by justitia.jura.uni-tuebingen.de with local + (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 15G6Zo-0002Zx-00 for <python-list@python.org>; Sat, + 30 Jun 2001 00:17:24 +0200 +Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:18:49 +0200 (CEST) +From: Carsten Geckeler <uioziaremwpl@spammotel.com> +Subject: Re: Augmented Assignement (was: Re: PEP scepticism) +In-reply-to: <ubsn7hte7.fsf@ctwd0143.fitlinxx.com> +Sender: python-list-admin@python.org +To: Python <python-list@python.org> +Errors-to: python-list-admin@python.org +Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0106300001530.2750-100000@athlon.de> +MIME-version: 1.0 +Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII +Precedence: bulk +X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 (101270) +List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org> +List-Subscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, + <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> +List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, + <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> +List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> +List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language + <python-list.python.org> + +On 29 Jun 2001, David Bolen wrote: + +> Carsten Geckeler <uioziaremwpl@spammotel.com> writes: +> +> > The problem which some people have with augmented assignment is not that +> > they exist, but that they do not work as they expect (at least from the +> > POV of some readers). I expect that +> > ident op= expr +> > works like +> > ident = ident op expr +> > +> > At least that's what I'd have expectd comming from other programming +> > languages. +> +> Of course, one interesting point is that while you may think the above +> if coming from, say, C, what "ident = ident op expr" means in C is not +> what "ident = ident op expr" means in Python. + +Yes, that's completely true. I can accept, that Python work differently +in many cases. Actually I love Python's object stuff. That's something +more natural that in many other languages. And I can accept, that objects +(which are bound to different variable names) can be changed (like with +l.extend). + +The point is not that Python differs from C (or other languages), but that +the two statements above work differently. I can accept that, of course +(well I have to, I thing ;) ). But, when I write the following three +statements, + l = l + [3, 4] + l += [3, 4] + l.extend([3,4]) +it seems more logical to me, that the first two do the same than the last +two. I know, of course, that the last two do the same. But anyway, the +first two just _look_ more the same. + +> In C it has the result of changing data (in either case) that is +> stored in a named location ident, in Python the long form just rebinds +> the reference ident to a new object and doesn't touch the original +> object. The short form can actually get closer to the C idiom if the +> object is mutable. +> +> So I wonder if some of the confusion is people familiar with other +> language's augmented assignment trying to extrapolate that into Python +> and then running into the pre-existing differences in assignment +> versus binding? + +No, that's at least no problem for me (see above). + +Cheers, Carsten +-- +Carsten Geckeler + + +-- +http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list + +--Boundary_(ID_MUSA353qRe9PeqtdeP14tg)-- + + |