aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tests/bounces/microsoft_01.txt
blob: 92465f78b8ba5a851b1a67c55705484039faf239 (plain) (blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
Return-Path: <MAILER-DAEMON>
Received: from bkb01-ims-01.ikon.com (bkb01-ims-01.ikon.com [205.145.1.251])
	by plaidworks.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g94LJbkw021463
	for <pit-penguins-bounces@plaidworks.com>; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 14:19:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bkb01-ims-01.ikon.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59)
	id <4C3HZXG8>; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:12:36 -0400
Message-ID: <44136F3E78E1C44EB52A3F95C986EAED09DB0AAB@BKB02-IMS-01.ikon.org>
From: System Administrator <postmaster@IKON.com>
To: pit-penguins-bounces@plaidworks.com
Subject: Undeliverable: RE: Waiver draft results explained
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:12:35 -0400 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59)
X-MS-Embedded-Report: 
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
	boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C26BEA.C2970D56"

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_000_01C26BEA.C2970D56
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"

Your message

  To:      pit-penguins@plaidworks.com
  Subject: RE: Waiver draft results explained
  Sent:    Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:10:56 -0400

did not reach the following recipient(s):

c=US;a= ;p=IKON;o=Nexus2;dda:SMTP=DJBENNETT@IKON.COM; on Fri, 4 Oct 2002
17:12:28 -0400
    The recipient name is not recognized
	The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=us;a=
;p=ikon;l=BKB02-IMS-010210042112TX06SNVK
    MSEXCH:IMS:IKON:Nexus2:BKB02-IMS-01 0 (000C05A6) Unknown Recipient



------_=_NextPart_000_01C26BEA.C2970D56
Content-Type: message/rfc822

Message-ID: <5.1.1.5.2.20021004224506.00bd9ff8@mail.chello.se>
From: Mikael Hedberg <mhedberg@chello.se>
To: pit-penguins@plaidworks.com
Subject: RE: Waiver draft results explained
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:10:56 -0400 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59)
X-MS-Embedded-Report: 
List-Help: <mailto:pit-penguins-request@plaidworks.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://plaidworks.com/mailman/listinfo/pit-penguins>,<mailto:pit-penguins-request@plaidworks.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://plaidworks.com/mailman/listinfo/pit-penguins>,<mailto:pit-penguins-request@plaidworks.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"


OK, one more time...slowly:

Youngsters like Berry, Meloche and TK are no longer exempt from regular 
season waivers. Hence, they'd have to pass through waivers to be sent down 
to WBS.

Now, during the waiver draft, to claim a player you must also unprotect one 
of your own players. This is different from the regular waivers, where any 
team can claim any player without giving up anything but the waiver fee. 
This means teams are more reluctant to claim guys, since they run the risk 
of losing one of their own players.

However, if a player was to pass through the waiver draft *unclaimed*, he 
would also count as having passed regular waivers -- and then be allowed to 
be sent down immidiately. This was most definitely Patrick's reasoning for 
Meloche and TK -- he said as much yesterday -- and probably also for Berry; 
ie. management wanted them playing in the minors, and this was the best 
chance of getting them there. The only other option would be to keep them 
on the big team for the entire season.

Also, if Washington ever wants to send Berry down, they must put him 
through waivers, where the Pens have the option of claiming him back -- and 
would then, as the original owning team, be free to send him down to THEIR 
minor club without putting him on waivers (NHL CBA, article 13.20, I
believe).

Personally, I think this whole Rick Berry issue has been totally blown out 
of proportion. It's not like he's the second coming of Ray Bourque or even 
Scott Stevens. He's a borderline NHL:er who probably would've played out 
most of the season in the minors anyway (seeing as how Penguins management 
weren't too high on him after camp). While I can't say I feel content to 
lose one asset of the Kasparaitis trade already, the reasoning behind this 
move is sound, and all you Pittsburgh/Mario/CP-bashers are really making a 
chicken out of a feather here.

__________________________________________________________________
  Mikael Hedberg                                mhedberg@chello.se

  "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations,
   if you live near one." ---J.R.R. Tolkien

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
pit-penguins mailing list
pit-penguins@plaidworks.com
http://plaidworks.com/mailman/listinfo/pit-penguins

------_=_NextPart_000_01C26BEA.C2970D56--