From 34d6ece8a454e5d1d027ed106ba039a0a88db36d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: bwarsaw <> Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 18:16:07 +0000 Subject: Copy the mm21 admin directory out of the mm21 branch. We'll svn external the latter to get that back into the release, but I really don't want to maintain multiple copies of the web pages. --- admin/www/mailman-admin/node11.html | 199 ------------------------------------ 1 file changed, 199 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 admin/www/mailman-admin/node11.html (limited to 'admin/www/mailman-admin/node11.html') diff --git a/admin/www/mailman-admin/node11.html b/admin/www/mailman-admin/node11.html deleted file mode 100644 index e74f8792..00000000 --- a/admin/www/mailman-admin/node11.html +++ /dev/null @@ -1,199 +0,0 @@ - - - - - - - - - - - - - -2.1.2 Reply-To header munging - - - - - -

-2.1.2 Reply-To header munging -

- -

-This section controls what happens to the Reply-To: -headers of messages posted through your list. - -

-Beware! Reply-To: munging is considered a religious issue -and the policies you set here can ignite some of the most heated -off-topic flame wars on your mailing lists. We'll try to stay as -agnostic as possible, but our biases may still peak through. - -

-Reply-To: is a header that is commonly used to redirect -replies to messages. Exactly what happens when your uses reply to -such a message depends on the mail readers your users use, and what -functions they provide. Usually, there is both a ``reply to sender'' -button and a ``reply to all'' button. If people use these buttons -correctly, you will probably never need to munge -Reply-To:, so the default values should be fine. - -

-Since an informed decision is always best, here are links to two -articles that discuss the opposing viewpoints in great detail: - -

- -

- -

-The three options in this section work together to provide enough -flexibility to do whatever Reply-To: munging you might -(misguidingly :) feel you need to do. - -

-

-
first_strip_reply_to
-
This variable controls whether any Reply-To: header - already present in the posted message should get removed before - any other munging occurs. Stripping this header will be done - regardless of whether or not Mailman will add its own - Reply-To: header to the message. - -

-If this option is set to No, then any existing - Reply-To: header will be retained in the posted - message. If Mailman adds its own header, it will contain - addresses which are the union of the original header and the - Mailman added addresses. The mail standards specify that a - message may only have one Reply-To: header, but that - that header may contain multiple addresses. - -

-

-
reply_goes_to_list
-
This variable controls whether Mailman will add its own - Reply-To: header, and if so, what the value of that - header will be (not counting original header stripping - see - above). - -

-When you set this variable to Poster, no additional - Reply-To: header will be added by Mailman. This - setting is strongly recommended. - -

-When you set this variable to This list, a - Reply-To: header pointing back to your list's posting - address will be added. - -

-When you set this variable to Explicit address, the value - of the variable reply_to_address (see below) will be - added. Note that this is one situation where - Reply-To: munging may have a legitimate purpose. Say - you have two lists at your site, an announce list and a discussion - list. The announce list might allow postings only from a small - number of approved users; the general list membership probably - can't post to this list. But you want to allow comments on - announcements to be posted to the general discussion list by any - list member. In this case, you can set the Reply-To: - header for the announce list to point to the discussion list's - posting address. - -

-

-
reply_to_address
-
This is the address that will be added in the - Reply-To: header if reply_goes_to_list is set - to Explicit address. - -

-

-
- -

- -

- - - - -- cgit v1.2.3