diff options
| author | tkikuchi <> | 2005-02-11 13:19:39 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | tkikuchi <> | 2005-02-11 13:19:39 +0000 |
| commit | 5bf70c1d11572bbf3081017409df108ddff578a3 (patch) | |
| tree | 6f5d7b18c65fce5cf9cf2c7929873d4c618508de /Mailman/Handlers/CookHeaders.py | |
| parent | 12ce1fcdab73f52b5ecb7a5c8cccafaf93478c08 (diff) | |
| download | mailman2-5bf70c1d11572bbf3081017409df108ddff578a3.tar.gz mailman2-5bf70c1d11572bbf3081017409df108ddff578a3.tar.xz mailman2-5bf70c1d11572bbf3081017409df108ddff578a3.zip | |
bumping 2.1.6b3
Diffstat (limited to '')
| -rw-r--r-- | Mailman/Handlers/CookHeaders.py | 5 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/Mailman/Handlers/CookHeaders.py b/Mailman/Handlers/CookHeaders.py index 3cc022a1..c76fe498 100644 --- a/Mailman/Handlers/CookHeaders.py +++ b/Mailman/Handlers/CookHeaders.py @@ -156,7 +156,10 @@ def process(mlist, msg, msgdata): # was munged into the Reply-To header, but if not, we'll add it to a # Cc header. BAW: should we force it into a Reply-To header in the # above code? - if mlist.personalize == 2 and mlist.reply_goes_to_list <> 1: + # Also skip Cc if this is an anonymous list as list posting address + # is already in From and Reply-To in this case. + if mlist.personalize == 2 and mlist.reply_goes_to_list <> 1 \ + and not mlist.anonymous_list: # Watch out for existing Cc headers, merge, and remove dups. Note # that RFC 2822 says only zero or one Cc header is allowed. new = [] |