diff options
author | Mark Sapiro <mark@msapiro.net> | 2014-04-25 21:03:52 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Mark Sapiro <mark@msapiro.net> | 2014-04-25 21:03:52 -0700 |
commit | 576d8d1659b0c98d1ac9fe33d2f23ead3e5c0bd3 (patch) | |
tree | 26e725a8efd6b75a082a8f6f6f1848541ae9faf7 | |
parent | d2f3fd4357520fce37fcc3edc5b6d8de7f5af879 (diff) | |
download | mailman2-576d8d1659b0c98d1ac9fe33d2f23ead3e5c0bd3.tar.gz mailman2-576d8d1659b0c98d1ac9fe33d2f23ead3e5c0bd3.tar.xz mailman2-576d8d1659b0c98d1ac9fe33d2f23ead3e5c0bd3.zip |
Changed from_is_list actions to insert the list address in Cc: if the
list is fully personalized. Otherwise, the list address is only in
From: and Reply-To: overrides it. (LP: #1312970)
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rwxr-xr-x | Mailman/Handlers/CookHeaders.py | 32 |
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/Mailman/Handlers/CookHeaders.py b/Mailman/Handlers/CookHeaders.py index 9f94bd4a..4fbfa311 100755 --- a/Mailman/Handlers/CookHeaders.py +++ b/Mailman/Handlers/CookHeaders.py @@ -201,24 +201,32 @@ def process(mlist, msg, msgdata): # Cc header. BAW: should we force it into a Reply-To header in the # above code? # Also skip Cc if this is an anonymous list as list posting address - # is already in From and Reply-To in this case and similarly for - # a 'from is list' list. - if mlist.personalize == 2 and mlist.reply_goes_to_list <> 1 \ - and not mlist.anonymous_list and not (mlist.from_is_list or - msgdata.get('from_is_list')): + # is already in From and Reply-To in this case. + # We do add the Cc in cases where From: header munging is being done + # because even though the list address is in From:, the Reply-To: + # poster will override it. Brain dead MUAs may then address the list + # twice on a 'reply all', but reasonable MUAs should do the right + # thing. + if (mlist.personalize == 2 and mlist.reply_goes_to_list <> 1 and + not mlist.anonymous_list): # Watch out for existing Cc headers, merge, and remove dups. Note # that RFC 2822 says only zero or one Cc header is allowed. new = [] d = {} - for pair in getaddresses(msg.get_all('cc', [])): - add(pair) + # AvoidDuplicates may have set a new Cc: in msgdata.add_header, + # so check that. + if (msgdata.has_key('add_header') and + msgdata['add_header'].has_key('Cc')): + for pair in getaddresses([msgdata['add_header']['Cc']]): + add(pair) + else: + for pair in getaddresses(msg.get_all('cc', [])): + add(pair) i18ndesc = uheader(mlist, mlist.description, 'Cc') add((str(i18ndesc), mlist.GetListEmail())) - # We don't worry about what AvoidDuplicates may have done with a - # Cc: header or using change_header here since we never get here - # if from_is_list is allowed and True. - del msg['Cc'] - msg['Cc'] = COMMASPACE.join([formataddr(pair) for pair in new]) + change_header('Cc', + COMMASPACE.join([formataddr(pair) for pair in new]), + mlist, msg, msgdata) # Add list-specific headers as defined in RFC 2369 and RFC 2919, but only # if the message is being crafted for a specific list (e.g. not for the # password reminders). |